The Himalayan region is currently experiencing nature’s relentless fury, with cloudbursts, landslides, and flash floods battering areas across Jammu, Kashmir, Udhampur, and Katra. Bridges have collapsed, vehicles swept away, and critical pilgrimages like the Vaishno Devi Yatra halted. In Himachal Pradesh alone, 156 lives have been lost since June 20. This escalating devastation, experts warn, is no longer merely a natural disaster; it is significantly aggravated by climate change, reckless urbanisation, and fragile mountain infrastructure. As the United Nations flags floods and droughts as distress signals of climate breakdown, the critical question arises: are we inadvertently engineering our own disasters in these vulnerable mountain zones?
Landslides pose a significant threat, particularly in geologically active regions such as the Himalayas, where their impact is worsening due to climatic shifts and human activities. In Nepal, the incidence of fatal landslides is increasing at a rate that surpasses the effects of typical monsoonal variations, with land-use changes, population growth, and the expansion of transport infrastructure identified as probable contributing factors. A notable concern is that poorly-engineered road construction in tectonically active areas, where many slopes are in a state of incipient failure, can effectively lower the threshold for a trigger event, leading to widespread landsliding along these alignments. This results in substantial loss of life, extensive damage to critical infrastructure, and severe economic repercussions. While India has a National Landslide Risk Management Strategy, implementation gaps persist at the local level. Similarly, Nepal's existing policies often struggle with effective execution due to political instability and insufficient support for decentralised efforts.
1. The Intensifying Threat: Climate Change and Human-Induced Vulnerability
"Experts warn this devastation is no longer just a natural disaster—it is aggravated by climate change, reckless urbanisation, and fragile mountain infrastructure". This observation underscores the compounding nature of landslide risk in the Himalayas. Three-quarters of the region's annual rainfall occurs during the monsoon season, characterised by sudden and extremely intense cloudbursts. This heavy precipitation can quickly saturate slopes, leading to instability. Beyond natural triggers, human activities significantly increase vulnerability. These include widespread land-use change, rapid population growth, and the extensive development of transport infrastructure. Local communities themselves acknowledge the negative impacts of quarrying activities on slope stability, which continue due to the economic value of stone and slate. Even agricultural practices like irrigation on "khet" land can contribute to instability. The direct human cost is stark: Himachal Pradesh alone recorded 156 fatalities from floods and landslides since June 20. Studies in Nepal indicate a clear upward trend in fatal landslide occurrences, with poorly-engineered roads being a major factor contributing to this increase.
2. Strategic Investment in Robust Investigation and Mitigation
To effectively counter the escalating threat, a more strategic and robust approach to infrastructure development is essential. "Whilst the philosophy behind rural access programmes is probably sound, it would appear that better selection of road alignments, enhanced site investigation and increased engineering design would greatly benefit the communities involved". The process must begin with thorough investigation, carefully defining the purpose, scope, area, and duration of the assessment. Crucial initial steps include site reconnaissance to identify key topographic and geologic features, existing drainage patterns, and potential seepage pathways. This is followed by subsurface investigations, which involve drilling test borings and excavating test pits to characterise conditions and define the extent of the slide.
For mitigation, a core principle is addressing water, a contributing factor in nearly all landslides. Drainage solutions are thus paramount. Corrective actions typically involve engineering solutions such as the construction of rock-fill buttresses or the installation of horizontal drains to lower groundwater levels. The "Landslide Best Practices Handbook" provides comprehensive guidance on systematic investigation and mitigation, stressing the need for site-specific solutions rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Furthermore, specific engineering guidelines are required for construction involving degradable materials and for cut-slope design, which currently lack sufficient precedent.
3. Harnessing Technology and Policy for Proactive Risk Management
Effective landslide risk management necessitates leveraging modern technology and implementing coherent policy frameworks. There is, however, a recognised challenge: "The problem of integrating academic knowledge into the implementing agencies is an alien concept for us. The government doesn’t normally take input from academia". This highlights a critical disconnect that hinders comprehensive disaster risk reduction.
On the technological front, IoT-based landslide and slope monitoring systems employing Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) offer low-cost, energy-efficient, and reliable solutions for real-time data collection and analysis in the Himalayas. These systems can be integrated with cloud platforms to provide instant alerts and utilise Android applications for targeted notifications to residents in at-risk areas based on district registration. Simple yet effective methods, such as extension-meters for monitoring tension cracks and wires across gullies to activate sirens for debris flows, also play a vital role.
From a policy perspective, India’s National Landslide Risk Management Strategy aligns with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Key policy recommendations include the formulation and stringent enforcement of Mountain Zone Regulations & Policies, particularly concerning building bye-laws and land-use planning. For example, encouraging farmers to switch from paddy fields to less irrigation-intensive crops like ginger or cardamom can improve livelihoods while reducing slope instability. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) must integrate detailed geomorphological assessments when selecting road alignments to proactively avoid existing landslides and minimise future hazards. Crucially, there is a need to mainstream Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) into all development activities and decentralise DRR efforts, providing necessary training and financial support at regional, district, and local levels.
Ultimately, building resilience into mountain infrastructure requires a proactive, interdisciplinary approach that integrates scientific and local knowledge, supported by robust policy and sustained financial commitment. Focusing solely on the physical hazard ignores the socio-economic factors driving communities to occupy dangerous areas, while a purely social science approach risks overlooking the destructive potential of high-magnitude events. As one expert noted, "Risk management cannot, of itself, address the underlying causes of poverty. But if approached from the standpoint of resilience, it can help to build those structures that will enable a greater degree of self-help. It is about helping people to help themselves". By fostering political will, enhancing coordination among stakeholders, and investing in preventative measures and early warning systems, mountain nations can safeguard lives, protect vital infrastructure, and pave the way for sustainable development in a changing climate.
Post a Comment